In 2025, the e-commerce landscape will be dominated by a few powerful platforms. This ranking of 5 best CMS for e-commercebased on their estimated number of active sites, offers a clear overview of the most widely adopted solutions worldwide. Whether you're a start-up or a major corporation, this guide will help you identify the platform best suited to your needs.
|
Rank |
CMS |
Creation date |
Number of sites used |
Main value |
Company owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
27 September 2011 |
~4.65 M sites (20.1 % market) |
Open-source flexibility built into WordPress |
Automattic |
|
|
2 |
Shopify |
2006 |
4.6 M sites (active) |
A very affordable all-in-one solution |
Shopify Inc. |
|
3 |
Magento (Adobe) |
31 March 2008 |
>150,000 shops |
Customisation and power (enterprise level) |
Adobe Inc. |
|
4 |
2007 |
Distributed worldwide (low market share) |
European open-source, rich in features |
PrestaShop SA |
|
|
5 |
Salesforce Commerce Cloud |
2004 (Demandware), acquired in 2016 |
~5,000 active sites (major retailers) |
Full integration with the Salesforce ecosystem |
Salesforce |
WooCommerce is an open-source WordPress extension launched in 2011. It lets you transform a WordPress site into a complete online shop, while taking advantage of the flexibility of the WordPress ecosystem. It is now the most widely used e-commerce CMS in the world, with over 4.6 million active sites.
Benefits
Seamless integration with WordPress, highly flexible and customisable.
Open-source, vast ecosystem of extensions and themes.
Very widespread: ~4.65 M sites (20.1 % global market share).
Disadvantages
Requires more technical skills, particularly for maintenance.
Pay-per-use extensions may generate additional costs.
Founded in Canada in 2006, Shopify has rapidly established itself as a benchmark in turnkey e-commerce. Its promise: to enable anyone to create an online shop without any technical skills. Today it has more than 4.6 million active websites worldwide.
Benefits
Intuitive turnkey platform, ideal for beginners.
Widely adopted: around 4.6 million active sites.
Solid support, rich app store, integrated payments.
Disadvantages
Regular subscriptions and additional fees (premium apps, transaction fees excluding Shopify Payments).
Less customisable than open-source platforms.
Magento, launched in 2008 and acquired by Adobe in 2018, is a CMS designed for complex e-commerce projects. It offers great power, advanced customisation options and a robust architecture. Its community remains active, although it is mainly adopted by large companies.
Benefits
Highly customisable, suitable for large, complex e-commerce projects.
Based on a robust architecture for large-scale performance.
Disadvantages
Complex to deploy and administer, requiring technical resources.
Less community and support than WooCommerce or Shopify.
Born in France in 2007, PrestaShop is an open-source CMS that has won over many e-tailers, particularly in Europe. It offers a comprehensive, customisable solution, with a good balance between ease of use and functional richness. Although its global market share remains modest, it retains strong local roots.
Benefits
French origin and open-source, well suited to the European market.
Numerous native functions and modules available.
Disadvantages
Limited global market share.
Less visibility and extensions than the leaders.
Salesforce Commerce Cloud, launched in 2004 under the name Demandware and acquired by Salesforce in 2016, is a SaaS e-commerce solution aimed at major international brands. It stands out for its advanced integration with Salesforce tools (CRM, marketing automation, customer service) and its ability to manage complex, multi-channel environments. It is less widespread in terms of volume, but remains a benchmark in the high-end segment.
Benefits
Cloud solution highly integrated with the Salesforce ecosystem (CRM, marketing, customer service).
Ideal for major international brands with complex requirements.
Premium support and automatic updates included.
Disadvantages
High costs, more suited to large companies than SMEs.
Less freedom to customise than open-source CMS.
